mikeZellers.blog

Sunday, January 08, 2006

brokeback mountain...

i saw brokeback mountain a few days ago. and i've thought a lot about it since. i guess that, in itself, is a sign of a great movie. it certainly has been the subject of much critical praise - which, if anything, i think can weigh down the movie with expectations.

a few things are inarguable: heath ledger is awesome in this role - i really don't know anything about him - but this performance was great...

the film is beautiful, really seems evocative of the place and time.

the music was wonderful, longtime favorite gustavo santoaolla (sp?) leads a great soundtrack (which i am loading now) - i remember when i bought ronroco - in the late 20th century - and it becamse one of my favorite records, yet, i could find almost no information or other records by him - now he seems to have found a niche in soundtracks - besides this one motorcycle diaries, and a few others - good for him - this kind of talent deserves success....and willie nelson's song over the closing was soooo touching....

the story was told in a very thoughtful and evocative way. i love the director ang lee - crouching tiger, hidden dragon is among my five or so fave movies ever - heck, i even liked his much lambastasted version of the hulk - the relationship between the two characters is touching - and again, it was ledger's performance that really brings it out. contrast how he is with everyone else with how he is with gyllenhal's (sp?) character...

on the down side - well, i guess i had a hard time understanding how two people could become so attached after such short and infrequent contact. i told my brother this and he laughed and said i was just like my dad (true, i'm sure) - just too left brained - and i don't believe my thoughts here are homophobic - were this a heterosexual relationship, i wouldn't get it either... (think bridges of madison county - on the other hand, don't)...of course, perhaps part of the point even, is how we tend to idealize relationships that don't work out - or that we don't let work out - or can't let work out...

on the other hand, this wasn't a heterosexual relationship - and perhaps that's part of the point - a couple such as the characters in this movie face pressures and thoughts that i can't imagine - so perhaps by definition "understanding" what they feel and go thru would not be easy for me...

the other thing, of course, is that not everyone is like me - perhaps others can create relationships quicker than i can - just because i find it implausible that i could fall so quickly and completely head over heels - to the point where i would carry a flame forever, does not mean that others couldn't - maybe I have the problem...

in any case, a great movie - while i feel perhaps some of the reviews are a bit overblown - it is great on so many levels and thought provoking...

if any of you (either of you?) that read my blog have seen it, i'd be curious of your thoughts....

7 Comments:

At 8:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

haven't seen it yet, but if you care to comment on my blog regarding Gene Shalit calling the character Jack a sexual predator, please do.

JenBen

 
At 9:16 PM, Blogger Karen Zipdrive said...

They formed a deep bond in the solitude of the ranch- with no distractions (except for the sheep, which, contrary to popular belief, gay men have no particular compulsion to fuck). Both were good looking and sensuous, it was cold out, they were lonely...then BAM!
They were there for months- they connected. They made deep impressions on one another- it happens.
The big picture is, many of us have a lost love, whom for one reason or another we cannot be with.
Mine was a Swiss woman, in Texas on a long vacation. It wasn't meant to be, but I'd drop everything for another chance to see her.

As for Gene Shalit- look at the guy. He's a freak.

 
At 12:15 PM, Blogger Mike said...

good point about how their isolation fostered a deep bond...

as far as shalit's comments - they are without any basis - either he is looking to create controversy for self-promotion, or he's lost it...

 
At 12:40 PM, Blogger Mike said...

as far as "lost love" i understand what you are saying, but at some point not letting go can cause problems with one's current relationships... as it did for Ennis... in ennis' mind, his relationship with jack could not work on a permanent basis - i realize this was no fault of theirs but of the prejudices of society - but to torture one's self with an on-again-off-again relationship seems to be the worst possible choice - perhaps this is what the movie's point is - capturing this dilemma...

perhaps it makes me sound cold, but at some point, i think one has to move on...

 
At 12:29 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

OK, finally saw it...

First of all, I can tell you that it isn't hard to fall in love with someone you've only known a short time. Also, if your next relationship is not as fulfilling, you will ache for what you had, as I think was the case. Also, Alma was reality. Crying babies, paying bills, living in a crappy apt. Jack was fantasy...not working, living off the land, being with someone who understands you . I mean, which would you rather have? Even if you can only have it for a week, it's better than busting your ass on someone else's ranch for your squealing kids and "plain" wife.

That's my 2ยข.

JenBen

 
At 11:55 AM, Blogger Mike said...

falling love in a short period of time - i suppose it depends on the people involved...
imho, you hit the nail on the head w/the fantasy vs. reality - the old grass is greener... but ultimately isn't that kind of illusionary love...love of the image rather than the person - that's why i feel love takes time...

 
At 8:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Food for thought: Why is everyone so fired up about this brokeback mountain movie? It really hasn't done all that well in the theaters anyways. The numbers I've seen say its only made about 150 million. (My numbers could be wrong and I freely admit that) And most people I've talked to say they haven't see it. And those that have say it's not that good anyways.
This is a clear cut case of the liberal agenda trying to force their opinion on homosexuality on us. And I for one am sick of it. Homosexuality goes against nature and God. You ever see two bucks doin it in the woods? And Leviticus 18:22 says: Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. I mean really, how much more proof do you need?
One more thing. The Passion of the Christ made over 400 million and wasn't even nominated for an Oscar. HMMMMMMM. Makes you think don't it?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Powered by Blogger